link to Home Page

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for March 17, 2012

Is the newly discovered asteroid 2012 DA14 legitimate or is this another coverup about debris from the Planet X complex. [and from another] 2012 DA14 was discovered on February 23, 2012, by the OAM Observatory, La Sagra in Spain. If it were to strike the Earth, it is estimated that it would produce the equivalent of 2.3 megatons of TNT. The Tunguska event has been estimated at 3-20 megatons. [and from another] A 150-foot asteroid orbiting Earth called 2012 DA14 will pass so close to Earth it will fly UNDER man-made satellites orbiting our planet. NASA's Impact Risk report said that the odds of the space rock actually hitting our planet are very low indeed - but on February 15 next year it will pass just 17,000 miles from Earth, closer than 'geostationary' satellites. If an asteroid of that size hit our planet, it would cause an explosion similar to a nuclear blast. [and from another] NEOs have become of increased interest since the 1980s because of increased awareness of the potential danger some of the asteroids or comets pose to the Earth, and active mitigations are being researched. As of 2008, two near-Earth objects have been visited by spacecraft: 433 Eros, by NASA's Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous probe, and 25143 Itokawa, by the JAXA Hayabusa mission.

Near Earth Orbit asteroids are nothing new, and have been a concern of NASA's for decades. Hunks of rock have always entered Earth atmosphere, and thus the fire balls that light up the sky from time to time. When fairly small, like the space junk that mankind leaves orbiting the Earth, these objects burn up in the atmosphere with little left to thud to the ground or on some hapless human's head. But in anticipation of the debris in the tail of Planet X, NASA and their partners have been concerned about large objects heading directly toward Earth. Would whole continents be destroyed?

Movies such as Armageddon were developed to educate the public for the time when NASA could muster such a defence. But during debates on the sci.astro newsgroup in the late 1990's between Jonathan Tate of the Spaceguard UK and ourselves, they themselves were educated. Attempting to divert, or explode an asteroid would do no good. So why return to warning the public about NEO asteroids? Should the elite need to rush to their bunkers, quickly and perhaps only temporarily, this would be the reason. It's not Planet X, folks, just a NEO scare!

The Zeta's have recently explained that the 7 of 10 scenarios are to be slowed down as well as explaining that their predictions were always worst case scenarios. My question is: they've predicted 90% of the world's population to be lost to the PS. Is that also a worst CASE scenario? Could the possible outcome also only be, say, 40%? Or is the 90% a hard, definite number?

There is much confusion regarding the deliberately held back pace of the 7 of 10 plate movements, and how this interference with the natural order of events during a passage of Planet X might affect our overall predictions. The 7 of 10 plate movements are going to occur regardless of how much they are held back at the start. Every jerk of the Earth during the daily wobble is impelling them to move. There are steps and stages in the plate movements as the hour of the pole shift approaches. What this delay means is that one of the plateaus will be shortened. The other 7 of 10 scenarios will follow each other with greater speed. And that there will be overlap with the later 7 of 10 plate movements and 8 of 10 scenarios.

Those who are confused about the deliberate delay are thinking of a continuum, a linear series of events where a delay in one place translates to a delay in the overall. If a skier on a steep slope were held back by a cord, so his pace was slowed, what would be the result? If the cord were cut, then the skier would pick up speed but his speed at the bottom would not be what it was formerly. His ability to accelerate would have changed. This would be the case if the Earth changes were linear, with only one impetus rather than many. The Earth wobble is an impetus that is a daily affair. It is a skier put on the slope daily, and each day the slope more steep than the last. Where his speed was slowed on one day, on the next he would arrive at the bottom sooner, and with greater speed.

Interfering with the pace of change thus has consequences. We have explained that the end result, the pole shift, would not be altered. Where a deliberate delay has been allowed essentially at the start of the 7 of 10 plate changes, to break the cover-up, this would certainly not be the case by the time the Last Weeks had arrived. Likewise, the 90% death rate we have predicted was not due to death from injury or drowning but rather due to depression, giving up because life was just not going to be the same and unlikely to return to a pre-shift level in their lifetimes. This is a choice that humans are allowed to make.

Has anyone seen the Ameritrade investment commercial? Talks about the Pole Shift and everyone floating into space. My thought was at least something about the Pole Shift is out there.
align="bottom" width=511 height=245>

Certainly the Mayan Calendar did not address the subject of a Pole Shift, or even great catastrophes. It is simply a calendar that ends, as the Mayan method of keeping time was a long repeating calendar. Nor is there any relationship in their Long Count or Ceremonial calendars to any astrophysics or Earthly events. The passage of Nibiru happens every 3,657 years on average, and the Long Count is approximately 5,126. We have explained that the assumed ending of the Mayan Calendar on December 21, 2012 is wrong, a mere guess.

The Ameritrade commercial mixes several concepts together - the supposed end of time as presented by the Mayan Calendar, a magnetic Pole Shift, and a loss of gravity. There is a common misperception that the pull of gravity will be eliminated during the pole shift, during the rotation stoppage in the Last Weeks. The reverse is true, as during rotation stoppage gravity will be increased slightly, though seeing man on the Moon, floating about, might have created confusion in some minds. Just what does the near presence of a larger planet do? Other than heaping the waters directly under the passing Planet X, nothing occurs.

Will this commercial bring business for Ameritrade? Those promoting it hope it will counter the urge to follow our advice, for the public to put their funds into gardens and flocks and herds, forsaking the Stock Markets. We have advised that paper money in all its forms will become worthless, the barter system replacing this. This commercial is attempting to ridicule our predictions, tying the concept of a Pole Shift to the misconception about how gravity will operate during a passage. And now that it is presumed that a Pole Shift will not occur during 2012, given the slow start to the 7 of 10 scenarios, it is safe, so they hope, to burry our warnings along with the Mayan Calendar hype.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) denied federal disaster declarations to many counties affected by severe storms and tornadoes last month. The world is still mired in the Second Great Depression and finances would be considered, but damage and destruction from these storms was often extensive or catastrophic. Is FEMA's decision sending a message to the American public that they should not rely on the federal government for aid following disasters? Is this the result of fiscal constraints or is something else going on? [and from another] Missouri counties hit by strong storms last month will not receive federal help as they try to recover and rebuild. Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon requested a federal disaster declaration for 18 Missouri counties, including Cape Girardeau, Scott, Stoddard and Bollinger, last week. A similar request for assistance from five Southern Illinois counties - Gallatin, Randolph, Saline, Union and Williamson - was also denied, a FEMA spokeswoman said.

Tornado season in the US is on the increase, the trend being for the season to start earlier and be more vicious. Records are broken almost every year lately, and now in 2012 the season has had a horrific early start. FEMA has a limited budget and is projecting where this will lead. The US government is bankrupt, continually extending its debt ceiling and living on freshly printed money. Can the current expectations of federal assistance and welfare subsidies be continued? Can private insurance companies be backed by the government when failures occur?

The point where Earth change disasters affect a given country's ability to help its citizens will come well before the Last Weeks, and each must decide where to draw the line. For countries such as Indonesia, where the sinking of the Sunda Plate has forced many from their homes and fields, the matter was settled easily. This dictatorship simply suppressed the press so that the disasters were not reported. When packaged rice and noodles could no longer be delivered, this matter was dealt with by suppressing media coverage and ignoring the complaints.

For democracies where laws are expected to be followed and the government expected to be responsive to the people who elected the leaders, it is a different story. In the US, some matters are in the hands of Congress, who can harangue over whether to allow the budget to be broken or whether setting limits is appropriate. Some matters are in the hands of the Executive Branch which can make determinations such as they did in this instance on tornado damage low interest loans. This is just the start, but one thing is certain. The populace must learn to depend upon themselves!

Severe flooding in Louisiana. Associated USA flood around Gulf of Mexico with 7 of 10? I do not know why but I think it is a loss of height. [and from another] Flood waters submerged parts of southern Louisiana Tuesday after heavy rains caused flash flooding and forced hundreds of rescues. The National Weather Service estimated 12 to 18 inches of rain fell across the region, with totals reaching up to 20 inches in some areas. Among the hardest hit areas in Lafayette Parish was Carencro, where reports indicated water was as high as high as 8 feet on some roads.

Just as the bowing in the S American Plate has produced stretching and consequent sinking in the swath of land from Rio to Buenos Aires, the bowing in the N American Plate has produced stretching and consequent sinking along the eastern seaboard and land bordering the Gulf of Mexico. Stretched land has only so many options. It can rip open to form a crevasse or a landslide or a sinkhole, or rock layers can pull apart so that train rails zip and zag and cause derailments and bridges pull from their moorings. In this case there is an adjustment in certain places, a pulling apart, which relieves the stress.

Stretched land also almost invariably drops in elevation, because the crust is thinned. This may not be apparent on the surface if the rock layers are pulling apart deep underground or under a river bed. But the underlying rock cannot spread out and thin without some evidence of this process above. For Florida, this evidence is the increasing number of sinkholes swallowing houses. Lopsided buildings, drooping roadways, and swamps extending their borders are other such symptoms. Drainage is invariably affected, as water lingers where it formerly drained. Rains and tides thus confuse the issue, with high tides blamed for much flooding, when sinking due to stretching is the cause.

Are the Zetas able to comment on the face-to-face meeting this week between Obama and Cameron and what they are discussing, as it's obviously going to be about the Pole Shift. Even this seasoned political journalist asks in his article. It seems to me that after the recent ZT regarding the boxes and the deliberately slowed pace of the 7/10, and the statement that the Council of Worlds was planning to 'shock' the world with a sign that would no doubt be sent with the intention of breaking or at least breaching the cover-up, that this visit and subsequent discussions are to address this subject. If they believe that the cover-up is going to be broken by the COW's actions, they might even be discussing how to get ahead of that by making some admission(s) beforehand. PS. If I haven't said it before, I've always thought that if PX was going to be admitted to, it would take a joint media statement from these two leaders - if only they had the balls to do it! [and from another] It is hard to see why Cameron needs to be in Washington. He and Barack Obama can chat on the phone. There is no great disagreement that needs sorting out face to face. [and from another] Barack Obama: UK-US alliance one of the greatest ever known Obama, who said the special relationship had never been stronger, pushed protocol to the limits to give the prime minister the biggest welcome accorded any world leader in Washington this year.

We have frequently stated that the sticky issue of the coming Pole Shift is not discussed over the phone or via courier, but only during face-to-face meetings. Thus the exhausted appearance of Secretary of State Clinton, who has announced she wants out at the end of 2012. But why all the fan fare? Obama appears to be making a statement with this meeting. Certainly the US government has an interest in a US/Australian base, with a reach to newly habitable land in Antarctica. And the US neighbor Canada is also a Commonwealth member.

When the Pole Shift is discussed, there are current partnerships and future partnerships that are brokered, and what Obama is clearly announcing here is that they expect the UK's extended kingdom and US interests to work toward mutual goals. Rather than press for US immigration to be eased, in the event of a European tsunami, Cameron has reached out to his Scandinavian neighbors to open dialog on solutions for many countries. Obama apparently approves.