|Fire in the Sky|
The Zetas have warned that we would soon start to see signs in the skies, and have stated that the chemtrail uptick is to fog
up our view. There have been reports on occasion, people noting a Second Sun rising at dawn, or an orb below the Sun
during the day.
Oct 28, 2006: I saw it , the Second Sun coming out of Walmart the other night here in AK. My husband and I and my
3 kids all seen it, there was no lens flare!! It had this huge light above the sun shooting straight upward like a flash
light beam. Underneath and over to the right was a huge orb that was a dark red and it was as large as the sun
Jan 25, 2007: I live in Southeastern Pennsylvania & can look out my kitchen window every morning to view the sun
rising. We've had clouds or chemtrails expanded this whole month, but this morning between the clouds I could
swear it looked like 2 suns there in the morning sky. Has anyone else mentioned this? I'd drag out my welding glass
but it is too dark to be definitive.
Feb 15, 2007: In early February on brief TV background shots including the Sun, especially with the Sun near the
horizon, a small second sun just to the lower right of the Sun, has been appearing on various programs. Is this
Planet X, the second sun, or is this merely another flare?
Mar 15, 2007: Talk show host Lowell Green, a top rated broadcaster on station CFRA in Ottawa, Canada
commented on his morning talk show about the moonlike object under the rising sun. This was at 09:35 EDT today,
March 15 2007. He made a point of re-positioning his microphone to get a better look out the window. He
questioned whether it really was the moon. Green is an ultra right wing host who normally debunks UFO theories
and conspiracies, so this is quite an event!
The Moon was nowhere near the Sun on Mar 15, 2007 and an orb hanging below the Sun would place this orb just below
the Ecliptic, per the Zetas the spot where Planet X currently rides. Here's a photo taken on an utterly clear pre-dawn
moment, posted on the C2C website. What else could that be, but Planet X? This object is also slightly below the Ecliptic,
positioned where the orange box is on the Skymap for this date and time and location.
Question: Is this Planet X? http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ I have been very hesitant to send this in, but a
friend told me that I had to. So, here it is. I was walking the boardwalk at Rehoboth Beach in Delaware early
one morning. I was there for a work-retreat. It was cold outside on November 16, 2006 and there wasn't anyone out.
I was just randomly taking pictures of the early morning sky when I saw this red ball, or what looked to me like fire.
I took this picture. I'm not sure what it is, if it is anything at all.
ZetaTalk Explanation 3/17/2007: We have stated that the common man should look to the skies, particularly at
dawn and dusk, for a return of the Second Sun. We have stated that chemtrails are being used to fog up the view,
this pace increasing, so the common man does not see what the elite have no explanation for, the presence of Planet
X in their view as they gaze toward the Sun. We have stated that the switch in daylight savings time, to start 3 weeks
earlier this year, was designed to keep the common man from gazing at the rising and setting sun when they had idle
time on their hands, commuters standing about waiting for a train or sitting in cars, caught in traffic. This
remarkable photo, taken at a moment when the rising Sun had not yet filled the skies with a glaring light, taken on a
cold clear day when there were no clouds or haze to cloud the view, shows what they have been trying to prevent! If
the establishment does not want you to see this monster approaching, coming at the Earth in a retrograde orbit most
often placing it to the right of the Sun, out near the orbit of Venus but four times the diameter of Venus, then look!
Compare the position and visibility to a Second Sun photo take by Mt. Wilson observatory on May 27, 2003. Similar
location, to the right of the rising Sun. In both cases, the Moon is in the photo, so there can be no doubt that this is not the
Moon. In 2003 sunlight was bouncing off the Planet X complex, reflecting light directly back toward Earth. In 2007, sunlight
is coming from behind the Planet X complex, so it is only tangental, but the red dust in the dust cloud shrouding Planet X is
more apparent. In 2003, it was on the opposite side of the Sun from Earth. In 2007, it is between the Earth and the Sun,
Global Warming in Disfavor
Is Global Warming caused by man's carbon emissions? The issue has long been disputed. If so, it is occurring faster than the
- Prominent French Scientist Reverses Belief in Global Warming - Now a Skeptic
March 02, 2007
- In the 1980s and early 1990s, when concern about global warming was in its infancy, little was known about
the mechanics of how it could occur, or the consequences that could befall us. Since then, governments
throughout the western world and bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change have commissioned billions of dollars worth of research by thousands of scientists. With a wealth of
data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed
dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming.
But per the Zetas, our current Earth changes are not due to Global Warming. As evidence of that, other bodies in the solar
system, such as Europa, a moon of Jupiter, and Mars, are experiencing global warming at the same time. Are Earth's carbon
emissions reaching that far into space? The Zetas, at the start of ZetaTalk, warned that both Global Warming and the Sun
would be blamed for the Earth changes. Anything but admit that Planet X was in our midst and causing havoc!
ZetaTalk Warning 6/15/1996: The weather is blamed on global warming, the greenhouse effect, which in and of
itself might be an explanation that would hold if weather were the only symptom. It is the heat from the core of the
earth and the increased earthquake and volcanic activity that boggles these attempts at alternative explanations.
The heating of the oceans and increasing tremors are thus blamed on solar flares, even though such activity in the
past was never associated with solar flares.
But Global Warming was trotted forth as the big boggie, even featured by Al Gore on his movie An Inconvenient Truth. Now
there are signs that this excuse has fallen out of favor, to be replaced by its alternative, blaming the Sun or strange emissions
from outer space.
- Chicken Little and Global Warming
February 7, 2007
- Henrik Svensmark of the Danish National Space Center believes that changes in the sun's magnetic field, and
the corresponding impact on cosmic rays, may be the key to global warming. Nigel Weiss, a past president of
the Royal Astronomical Society and a mathematical aerophysicist at the University of Cambridge, correlates
sunspot activity with changes in the Earth's climate. Habibullo Abdussamatov, who heads the space research
laboratory at Pulkovo Astronomical Observatoryin Russia, points out that Mars is also undergoing global
Why the switch? Because Global Warming won't cover the increasing earthquakes and volcanism, which are due to become
much worse! Per the Zetas, the Sun has also be long positioned to take the blame for Earth changes caused by Planet X.
ZetaTalk Prediction 1/15/1998: Alarms about solar flares are exaggerations. Solar flares will increase as the time of
the passage approaches, but are in and of themselves not devastating. They, like the earthquakes that are on the
increase, will increase in number, and plague electronic communications, but have little effect on the tides, growing
seasons, or the weather. Those who would shield the populace from the truth of the approach of Planet X will say
otherwise, declaring that this is the cause of the increase in deep earthquakes, the chronic El Nino, and magnetic
diffusion. It is not. It is just yet another symptom of the approach of the rogue planet that causes the Earth such
devastation during its periodic passage.
Are giant whirlpools forming in the oceans? A monster whirlpool has formed off the coast from Sydney, Australia.
- Mysterious Eddy forms off Sydney Coast
March 14, 2007
- A large cold-water eddy has developed off the coast of Sydney causing the sea surface to fall by almost a
metre. The mysterious whirlpool has also caused ocean currents to change course and stretches 200km across
and one kilometre down to the ocean floor, CSIRO oceanographers say. Oceanographers say the centre sits
100 km off the coast and could stay there for several months. The eddies cannot be seen with the human eye,
but could contribute to cooler beach swimming conditions.
The Zetas warned of this!
ZetaTalk Warning 1/12/2000: We also predict that there will begin to be reports of whirlpools in the oceans that will
startle those who have never seen such a thing in the oceans.
Per the Zetas Safe Locations info, Sydney is also positioned where water is forced down from the Pacific or up from the
Antarctic, as Sydney is along the channel between Australia and New Zealand. A perfect setting for swirls to develop.
ZetaTalk Sydney: Where the east coast of Australia will bounce up during the pole shift, due to the tipping of the
plate upon which Australia rests, it will be subject to onslaughts of tidal waves during the shift itself. Water will
move through the channel between Australia and New Zealand. The compression of the Pacific will push water up
along any coast line directly bordering the Pacific. Swirling will occur.
Then, reported on the same day, March 14, a billion dollar submarine when missing off the coast of Florida.
- Billion-Dollar U.S. Sub Disappears Overnight for Several Hours
March 14, 2007
- The Navy mobilized a search-and-rescue operation Tuesday night after it believed one of its submarines, the
USS San Juan, had gone missing off the coast of Florida with 140 crew members aboard. The concern was so
high that Defense Secretary Robert Gates was notified of the situation overnight, as was White House national
security adviser Stephen Hadley, who was preparing to brief President Bush with the news when
communications were re-established with the missing submarine. The Navy had also begun notifying the
families of the 140 crew members that the submarine was missing. The incident is under investigation with the
focus being on why the ship missed a pre-established communications period with surface ships. No
mechanical problems were found aboard the submarine and officials were looking at why the submarine had
missed its communication period. Navy officials say the search was launched after surface ships spotted what
appeared to be a red flare in the vicinity of where the submarine had been operating. A red flare is an
indicator that a ship is in distress. With the loss of communications, a search-and-rescue effort was
Is there a relationship? Somewhat, per the Zetas, in that water on the move is involved in both instances.
ZetaTalk Explanation 3/17/2007: What was the cause of this submarine's inability to communicate with the surface?
Submarines, when under water, must use low frequency communications, which include vibrating the water around
them in order to send their messages in a coherent manner. The message, in short, rides on the waves, which are
always present in an area and predictably moving in one direction or another. If the message is moving in the
opposite direction of the wave, it likewise encounters predictable motion in the waves, regular and steady. Wave
action is taken into consideration by the communication software, so these slow undulations are factored in, the
wave rate sensed as a separate thing, like noise, and then omitted from the message. This is the science of noise
reduction in audio transmissions, to sense the noise, isolate it, and then eliminate it. What if the wave action
changes? Wave action is a result of equalizing pressure in the ocean. The press of water from the Equator round
toward the poles and back again, the swirling Coriolis effect caused by the rotation of the globe. The streams of
water that run along coastlines during this process, blocked by the coast. Has something changed? Nancy and a
crew of what she calls the Trusted 12 observed a very errant lurch of the Earth to the West in the predawn hours in
the US, such that constellations were out of place by as much as 50° for a brief time. What would such a lurch do to
the ocean currents? The normal currents along the East Coast would be accelerated as the land moved under the
water, and current would be forced on Europe with excessive pressure. The point being that the wave action rhythm,
encoded into the encryption software decoding the communication pulses, would be wrong for this temporary new
wave rhythm. What does this mean for submarines in the future, during the increasing Earth changes and through
the pole shift? If any in the elite were expecting to be able to use submarines, to ride out the pole shift or as
intimidation in any power play to take over the world after the shift, this is a message. Submarines will not survive.
Not because their communications will not function, but for dozens of other reasons the elite have not even taken
Residents of North Carolina are reporting the Earth rumbling under their feet!
There is a sound and a feel of rumbling coming from underground that occurs a few times a day. This started about
a year ago and is more frequent recently. We live in Eastern North Carolina just East of Raleigh and we don't have
earthquakes often and they are usually very light.
Signs that the N American continent is being pulled, on a diagonal, the New Madrid adjustment pending. The Carolinas were
damaged during the 1811-12 New Madrid quake, as they lie on a related fault line. The Carolinas were also one of the spots
getting a UFO blitz in February, as a warning of pending Earth changes. Recently someone reported on mysterious holes in
the clouds, and per the Zetas, there's a relationship!
Question: I have been noticing for about two years, and so have others, strange almost perfectly circular holes
opening up in clouds. I recently took a picture of one over my back yard, one of a series of four that formed
while I watched. My batteries died after taking this picture, which is also happening quite a bit around here. South of
Columbia SC. I took it with a polaroid digital camera. Can the zetas comment about these holes in the clouds?
ZetaTalk Response 3/10/2007: Such a hole was also noticed during the O'Hare airport sighting of a large ship by
United employees on Nov 7, 2006. We have stated that such sightings, over places that will be shortly devastated by
plate movements, are being warned not only by the sighting itself but by telepathic warnings given to the populace.
South Carolina was one such place to report a UFO blitz during this same time period. What causes the holes? The
recent evacuation of a mothership or large ship, which was there, but concealed by the bending of light rays around
the ship. Once the ship leaves, on a cloudy day, the hole in the clouds is at first apparent!
Earth Wobble Lurch
From the far North, a report that the Sun is no longer where expected.
- Inuit seek Answers to Arctic Sun Quirks
March 9, 2007
- For the past several years, residents in the High Arctic have observed that the winter dark season is ending
earlier than usual, with the sun coming up at a different place than what people are used to seeing. A bit
further south, Igloolik Mayor Paul Quassa said hunters have noticed the same phenomenon. The resident
meteorologist in Resolute Bay said the likely cause of this rising sun mystery is a temperature difference
between the very cold air over the snow and the air above, which has been warmer than usual.
An Earth wobble has been in place since the start of 2004, well documented by observations from around the world. Until
2005 this wobble took the shape of a Figure 8 but recently changed! A report from Cincinnati indicated the position of the
Big Dipper and Polaris were out of place the hour before dawn, showing an extreme lean to the West. I put out a request to
a dozen trusted individuals for observations. The team produced a report that included a confirmation from Chili, a 50% lean
in the hour before dawn, and a report from El Paso that confirmed Madrid Spain, a 20% lean just hours earlier. I found this
confirmation from trusted sources compelling. None of these individuals know each other, and all were blind CC'd on
correspondence. The observations recorded from others among the trusted 12 showed that many observations were normal,
in Japan and on the West Coast, and these reports likewise confirmed each other. This was data gathering, not preconceived
notions. The Zetas had warned that Signs in the Skies could be expected after Feb 25, 2007, and these observations were
taken on Feb 28 and Mar 7. The Zetas called these aberrations an intermittent lurch to the West.
ZetaTalk Explanation 3/10/2007: An unexpected result from the data gathering Nancy and friends did was the
finding that the lurch of the N Pole away from the Sun and Planet X was occurring during the hours when the N
Pole of Earth was hidden by the curve of the Earth. If Planet X can envelope the Earth in its magnetic field when the
Earth's magnetic hot spots are hidden from view, but not when they present, then this grip, at its present distance
from Earth and its present progress in its 270° roll, is tenuous. Rising a bit more toward the Ecliptic, and
encountering a stronger headwind in the backwash of returning particles, is all it takes to trip the balance back to
where the Earth aligns with the Sun's magnetic field instead. What this intermittent lean to the West is showing is the
type of gyrations the Earth will undergo as Planet X continues its steady path in the direction of Earth. Things will
not be normal, and sudden adjustments will occur.
The Zetas pointed back to earlier live chats on Jan 13 and Feb 3 wherein they had explained that as Planet X rises to the
Ecliptic it deals with an increased backwash of particle flows coming back to the Sun's middle, which would blow back the
Planet X magnetic field.
ZetaTalk Explanation 2/3/2007: We reported recently that Planet X was at the 135 degree point. This is not a lineal
process, as is it also lifting up to encounter the Ecliptic backwash.
ZetaTalk Explanation 1/13/2007: Another aspect is the elevation to the Ecliptic, as when slightly below the Ecliptic
it can point its N Pole out into space, but when at the Ecliptic, it must hose at an inbound particle flow and this
pushes back against Planet X.
But what might occur next? The Earth is clearly about to be enveloped in the magnetic field of Planet X, more gyrations can
You received this Newsletter because you subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.