| |
|
ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for April 21, 2012
These two recent White House Executive Orders (see below) seem rather mundane, but with a 7/10 and Pole Shift trained mindset, they seem to me like additional legal landscape to permit rapid, legally unhindered federal emergency response to enable 1) repairing and rebuilding infrastructure and 2) powering post 7/10 effected regions in the United States. Nearly 69% of U.S. crude oil imports originated from five countries in 2011 - Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Venezuela, and Nigeria http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5570 Most of the major U.S. oil refineries are located in Louisiana, Texas and California, areas that are expected to be casualties http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_refineries#United_States Note that the major crude oil transport pipelines within the continental United States are located in regions that are quite likely to be devastated by the 7/10 New Madrid earthquake/s. Canada supplies 2 million of the 9 to 10 million barrels a day of oil imported by the U.S. Even if just the oil transport nodes of Chicago, Houston and New Orleans go offline due to the 7/10 New Madrid events, then the entire U.S. oil transport network is dealt a devastating blow.
http://www.pipeline101.com/overview/crude-pl.html
http://theagecases.blogspot.com/2010/10/case-126-pipeline-wars.html
http://dirtyoilsands.org/images/uploads/ustarsandsmap.jpg
http://www.pipeline101.com/overview/products-pl.html
Notice how many of the shale gas and tight gas deposits in the U.S. are located in regions that a strategist at the White House may reasonably think would be much less effected/damaged than those in, near or east of the 7/10 effected New Madrid Fault Zone region. Map of US Shale Gas Deposits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Shaleusa2.jpg Map of US Tight Gas Deposits: http://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=346&c_id=4 From the map below it seems the White House is targeting the Wind River, Powder River, Cherokee & Forest River, and Northern & Central Appalachian natural gas reserves of the United States -- gas deposits located pretty far afield from what they likely believe will be future 7/10 New Madrid damage to the US energy infrastructure. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/futuresupply/coalbedng/coalbed_ng.html The coal bed methane seems one of their likely targets, though I don't understand how they plan to transport it with a 7/10 damaged transport network. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/1470/147012859006.pdf [and from another] http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/13/executive-order The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, For Immediate Release, April 13, 2012 Executive Order -- Supporting Safe and Responsible Development of Unconventional Domestic Natural Gas Resources [and from another] http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/22/executive-order The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, For Immediate Release, March 22, 2012 Executive Order -- Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects
As much as the US worried about being energy independent, matters will
only get worse as the 7 of 10 plate movements create stress on the
infrastructure within the US. Already the bowing of the N American Plate
is threatening to fracture pipelines and explode refineries. When the New
Madrid adjustments tear bridges and pipelines along the Mississippi, and
the great San Andreas shifts shortly thereafter, the oil and gas
production and distribution within the US will be permanently damaged. The
US government knows this, and under the quiet but determined direction of
Obama has been scouting solutions to this crisis.
The Bush administration’s answer to this threat was to invade Iraq,
subsequently invade Iran, and make the Bush family and their cronies kings
in the Aftertime when they would be in control of black gold – oil.
Obama is a realist and has no intention of invading Venezuela or being an
aggressor against Iran, as it is clear that the US is broke and unable to
muster sympathy for their aggression from allies around the world. The
proper course of action is to look inward, toward wind and water power,
solar panels, and petrol energy resources within the US. Obama has been
fostering growth in all these directions, from the start of his
administration in 2009.
How devastating will the anticipated earthquakes be? The New Madrid
adjustment will obviously break the distribution pipelines coming from the
Gulf, and in that the bridges across the Mississippi will be torn and land
just to the west of the Mississippi dropped, all states east of the
Mississippi will find their supply suddenly stopped. Of course,
significant quakes leading into the big one will make this trend obvious.
Other than attempt to store oil ahead of time, there is little that can be
done about this sudden disruption. The fools in the Bush family, who were
told by the lying Service-to-Self aliens that Houston would be a safe
location, focused oil reserves in caverns on the Gulf coastline, near
Houston. All that will shatter and leak.
Supplies via Canada will survive the New Madrid adjustments, but as the
booming in Wisconsin towns has shown, will not survive the tearing of the
Seaway which will accompany the New Madrid adjustment. Thus, the East
Coast of the US will find itself in a devastating energy crisis, which
recent Executive Orders to facilitate gas production from coal deposits in
the Appalachian mountains will do little to ease. This will be addressed
by attempts to ship oil directly from the Gulf or the North Seas to newly
built refineries on the East Coast, but none of this will ease the crisis.
Natural gas is amenable to being piped, but not transported by truck or
ship, and thus this crisis will be the greater.
What will this mean to the US as a functioning economy, as a country in a
temperate zone where home heating relies upon oil and increasingly on gas,
and where the citizens have been encouraged, primarily by the Bush family,
to drive bigger gas-guzzling cars and plow around in recreational cigar
boats that are likewise gas-guzzlers? For those who note that we are
hitting on the Bush family here, this is for a reason. Politicians that
have leaned so heavily to the Service-to-Self spiritual orientation that
they are virtual pawns of these visitors should be suspect. Those in the
Service-to-Self lie, and their goal is to harvest as many souls as
possible during the crises to come. Fear, a sense of hopelessness, anger
at being deprived of what they have been told is the American Dream, the
right to live high on the backs of others, all this impels a soul toward
the Service-to-Self.
The correct adjustment when the infrastructure is devastated, or when
supplies get tight, is to cut back on selfish expectations and share what
is available with others. Since all homes cannot be heated, moving in
together so that one heated house can supply several families should be
mandated. This will bring screams from everyone who has been told they
should expect their own home, their own apartment, that this is their
right. In decades past extended families lived together, the oldsters
helping young mothers with their babies, and since this type of living
will be the norm in the Aftertime, get used to it early. Large homes of
the wealthy should be the first restricted in gas usage. Take in the
masses or use fewer rooms.
If despite Obama’s encouragement windmill and solar panel use within the
US is still being neglected in preference to what some politicians
following the Bush family leadership advise (“drill baby drill”), this is
a matter that can be remedied relatively quickly. Constructing and
erecting windmill farms would be faster than attempting to transport
refined gasoline or heating oil by boat to the East Coast. Follow the lead
of countries like Sweden, which have utilized wind power for decades. The
US of course will not recover from the New Madrid and what is to follow
along the West Coast. Howls of rage and demands will come from all
sectors, a matter which, unfortunately, cannot be resolved by mere
Executive Orders.
A Korean-born American health expert Jim Yong Kim has been chosen as the new president of the World Bank, nominated by President Barack Obama. Is this too little and too late or is he likely to make a difference in terms of social justice as the world is now heading towards trouble times?
http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/13444437/new-president-of-world-bank-announced/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/apr/16/jim-yong-kim-world-bank-president?newsfeed=true
[and from another] http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/apr/15/jim-yong-kim-profile-world-bank Barack Obama put forward Jim Yong Kim as the United States's nominee for president of the World Bank, the pre-eminent multilateral development agency. Kim is all but certain to be approved by the bank's executive board. In any other year, the choice of a 52-year-old doctor who established innovative programmes to fight HIV-Aids and tuberculosis would have been applauded as progressive — especially as the bank's previous 11 presidents have all been white men. The difference is that this year, for the first time, the US nominee is being challenged by a strong candidate from the developing world, Nigeria's finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.
Traditionally a bastion of appointees who are cronies of the wealthy
elite, Obama’s has broken precedent in appointing a new president who
comes from the ranks of those who actually care about humanity. Look at
the past list of recent appointees
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_bank – Bush appointee Robert B.
Zoellick (Bank executive with Goldman Sachs), Bush appointee Paul
Wolfowitz (US Deputy Secretary of Defense), Clinton appointee Sir James
Wolfensohn (Corporate lawyer and banker), Bush appointee Lewis T. Preston
(Bank executive with J.P. Morgan). These were appointees certain to
continue the New World Order desire to enslave developing countries by
debt. Jim Yong Kim on the other hand has no cronies in the banking
empires of the world, nor is he personally interested in enslaving mankind
but rather being innovative to assist them. Like Obama, this man will be
shielded from assassination attempts, which will surely follow, as those
who are being denied their opportunities to control developing countries
by debt will be enraged.
Can the Zeta's comment on the "Dropped Quakes" blog posted here?: http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dropped-quakes This Array Network Facility website briefly showed 5 quakes ranging from mag 5-6 spanning across thousands of miles Canada’s Northwest Territories, Hudson Bay and Quebec from April 11-16 on three separate occasions. However, I could not find any additional information beyond the short time they were on this website to support they did happen. ie. twitters reports or any news reports. Also, I did not see any reports of these earthquakes on Canadas's ISM seismic network. It has been demonstrated that the USGS drops quakes or straight out fails to report them even when they were felt. Canada’s north is sparsely populated but a series of quakes this large over such a vast area would be very significant and news worthy and must have been felt by some if they did indeed happen.
These were duly reported quakes because the seismographs recorded the
signature of a quake. The N American continent is being pulled into a bow,
as mining accidents across the midsection from Utah to West Virginia,
sinkholes across the midsection from Tennessee to Pennsylvania, Seaway
booms and hums from Ontario to Wisconsin and Michigan, and earthquakes
from Acapulco to Seattle have shown. This process has accelerated, and as
the booms in Wisconsin have shown, the ripping apart of the Seaway is a
major focus. More than the land in the line of rip along the Seaway is
involved.
So why would the northern swath of Canada suddenly have these dropped
quakes? Note the swath of lakes just under the line drawn by the dropped
quakes. From Lake Superior to Lake Winnipeg to the Great Slave lake to the
Great Bear Lake these lakes are there because this land has been pulled
apart during prior Pole Shifts. The bowing of the N American
continent is a regular feature of prior Pole Shifts. Before the Seaway
spreads, this region of lakes is stretched, and drops in elevation. The
region where the dropped quakes were recorded is stretched FIRST, and
tearing rock recorded as earthquakes.
Why would the USGS and their cohorts so quickly drop these quakes? Such
quakes have been dropped regularly over the past decade, especially since
Planet X entered the inner solar system. If out in the ocean, or in a
poorly populated area, just dropped. If hiding them cannot succeed dumbing
them down to a lower magnitude or combining them into a single quake is
done. This was a risky move, as there were several
quakes, already announced officially, but such risks will increasingly be
taken as the quake frequency and severity increase. If challenged, it was
just a mechanical problem with the equipment.
A recent study on Asian Glaciers explains how the Karakaram Range is building more glacial ice and defying all trends by "getting thicker". Is the 7 of 10 pushing up the range even higher causing more glacier ice to develop in the region? This range is already extremely high elevation. [and from another] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17701677
A French team used satellite data to show that glaciers in part of the Karakoram range, to the west of the Himalayan region, are putting on mass. The reason is unclear, as glaciers in other parts of the Himalayas are losing mass - which also is the global trend. [and from another] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karakoram The Karakoram is home to the highest concentration of peaks over eight kilometres (five miles) in height to be found anywhere on earth, including, the second highest peak of the world (8,611 m/28,251 ft). K2 is just 237 m (778 ft) lower than the 8,848 m (29,029 ft) tall Mount Everest. The range is about 500 km (311 mi) in length, and is the most heavily glaciated part of the world outside the polar regions. The Siachen Glacier at 70 km and the Biafo Glacier at 63 km rank as the world's second and third longest glaciers outside the polar regions.
Why would ice and snow be building in the Karakoram range while
decreasing elsewhere? There are several factors. India is pushing under
the Himalayas, and rock scraping along rock releases heat, as the smoking
crevasses near Everest show. Higher elevations usually escape such
heat, as these mountains are riding atop the lower layers were subduction
scraping occurs. There is also the issue of weather patterns, which change
about because of the wobble. If water laden air is moving at high
elevations, it will be encouraged to deposit its water there, as anything
from dust in the air to objects such as mountain sides will cause
condensation. Scientists looking at these puzzles are not looking broad
enough, but using a narrow view, which is so often mankind’s error in
these scientific matters.
Partnering with RT, the opening episode of Julian Assange's new talk show featured an interview with militant leader Hassan Nasrallah, whose Syria-backed Hezbollah militia is considered a terrorist organization in the United States and Europe. This Wikileak interview is a major confrontation with the west especially countries like USA and off course Israel. This is embarrassment to both USA and Israel. What surprises me is that this news is even published in the main stream media. Why would Assange be allowed to perform these interviews at the first place? How important is this piece of interview in terms of breaking the cover ups of secret agendas by Israel and USA? Apart from what's being said during the interview, is there any hidden messages that Wikileak wants to tell the world? Would Zetas like to make any comments on this matter in general?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDLXPpooA18
http://rt.com/news/rt-assange-show-wikileaks-125/
http://rt.com/news/assange-hezbollah-nasrallah-syria-263/
[and from another] http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/13457508/assange-interviews-hezbollah-leader/
The half-hour segment on Assange's The World Tomorrow show aired on Kremlin-backed broadcaster RT on Tuesday and featured questions about Israel, Lebanon, Syria, theology and encryption. But he did reveal that his group had been in touch with opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Nasrallah claimed that Hezbollah had been rebuffed. Assange himself said he anticipated criticism along the lines of: "There's Julian Assange, enemy combatant, traitor, getting into bed with the Kremlin and interviewing terrible radicals from around the world." But the Australian said that RT had a big audience and his guests had told him things they "could not say on a mainstream TV network." Assange remains under strict bail conditions at an undisclosed location in England while he fights extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations.
The wagons are circling amid those elements that want the cover-up over
Planet X and the alien presence to continue,
and those that are comfortable allowing the public to learn the truth.
China has a firewall to prevent its public from access to banned websites,
a firewall that was constructed at the inception, whereas Russia allowed
the Internet to be inserted into its territory without such restrictions.
Thus, RT flourishes as the IP of choice among those wanting the news to be
frankly and honestly reported. Russia has allowed frank discussion of
Planet X signs and signs of the alien presence such as crop circles on its
media, even allowing government officials to comment freely.
Assange is already in the cross-hairs of the big guns in the cover-ups,
and is only alive because he is under a protection, as he knows. Blocked
from releasing leaked material, and personally under assault by a false
sexual harassment charge, he is doing what he can to lead the charge
against disinformation and secret government operations. With a nose for
relevant news, and an even better nose for lies and deception, he is
hoping to start a trend. Will he succeed? How will the world block the RT
news outlet? Attempt to “reason” with Russia? In the short term, his
campaign will succeed.
Is James Cameron investing in future space mining or is something more sinister going on here? Just seems like too many heavy hitters involved. [and from another] Is James Cameron launching an asteroid mining company? [Apr 18] http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/james-cameron-launching-asteroid-mining-company-204737338.html A new company called Planetary Resources held its official launch today promising a new venture that would merge "space exploration and natural resources," while adding "trillions" of dollars to the global GDP. The company counts some heavy-hitters amongst its founders and financial backers, including filmmaker/explorer James Cameron, Google co-founders Larry Page and Eric Schmidt, Ross Perot Jr. Charles Simonyi, formerly of Microsoft. The group's somewhat vague press release has the site Technology Review thinking the new company's goal "sounds like asteroid mining." [and from another] Are Ross Perot Jr. and Google's Founders Launching a New Asteroid Mining Operation? [Apr 18] http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/mimssbits/27776/?p1=blogs An impressive array of backers are behind the new firm Planetary Resources.
What are they up to? Certainly the expense of a space flight would not be
justified by a mining effort. Space Guard and other government sponsored
operations intent upon diverting the large moons of Planet X from a
possible impact with Earth have long been in operation, but government
funds have become scarce what with the global economic depression ongoing.
Space Guard in any case has never figured out a way to divert incoming
hunks of rock, despite the hype, as we explained to Jonathan Tate of Space
Guard in 2001. Yet deflecting debris during the onslaught
anticipated from the tail of Planet X is exactly what this crew is about.
The wealthy normally mine and harvest public services from the taxpayers
of the world, reserving their millions to enhance their personal comfort
or amusement. They may claim they pay their fair share of taxes but the
vast majority of public services is paid for and maintained by the common
man. In fact, were the contributions of the rich to disappear, it would
not even be noticed, such is their actually contributions. Meanwhile,
worldwide, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, as the rich buy
influence among those who establish the laws and appoint judges.
This is rarely called into question, this status quo, until a situation
like the inbound Planet X and its threat to their precious lifestyles
emerges. First, demands are made upon the governments of the world. When
it is clear that the government cannot or will not provide the protection
the wealthy think is their due, then they ponder taking matters into their
own hands. Brandson’s Virgin Galactic has put into place an escape into
space, but as the reality of the debris in the tail of Planet X has
emerged in the form of fireballs and large debris visible to even the
common man with a mere floppy disc insert, fear has gripped the tender
bellies of the wealthy elite.
What to do? Since they are under restrictions not to break the cover-up
over the presence of Planet X, they must have excuses for building an
apparatus to go forth into space. They are vague on the reasons, as anything they propose will seem
ludicrous. There is no mineral worth the expense, as it already exists on
Earth and can be mined there. Brandson is already offering space flights
on Virgin Galactic,
supposedly for entertainment, though escape from the surface of Earth
during the hour of the Pole Shift is the reason. It is already obvious
from Cameron’s trench curiosity that he is aware of our 7 of 10
predictions, and Brandson’s dive into the Puerto Rico trench is adding an
explanation point to that.
So without a valid excuse they can offer, and with a suspicious public
casting a leary eye on their endeavor, they set forth to do .. what? They
have no plan beyond getting a fleet of ships up where they can do ..
something. Astrophysicists, who have conducted tests via probes landing on
asteroids, don’t have a means of deflecting
an asteroid, which merely continue on their original path after the
attempt. Explosives don’t work
either, as we also explained in sci.astro debates with Jonathan Tate of
Space Guard, as the asteroid merely jumps away from the explosion.
What the sci.astro debates showed, in excruciating clarity, is the tunnel
vision that mankind often uses to explain why things work. A simple
exercise we used during the debates showed that two math formulas – the
inverse square law for gravity attraction and the centrifugal force law –
could not be put together on the same page. Man cannot explain why the Moon remains in space and does not
plunge to the ground. Have they learned anything in the last decade? Their
arrogance has, if anything, increased. But one thing is clear. The wealthy
elite are in the know about the inbound Planet X threat, and you, the
common man, are being denied this information.
