Light towers made an entrance in January, 2008 in Iraq, Germany, and Canada and were featured in
Issue 60 of this newsletter. The are tall spires of light in the sky, often topping off with a curl of smoke
like a mini-tornado.
Per the Zetas, this is methane, released during shifting between rock layers and set aflame as it rises.
Methane is lighter than air, and thus rises.
ZetaTalk Light Towers 1/24/2008: Man is used to thinking of chemical reactions involving
petrochemical components and oxygen as an explosion, happening suddenly - boom! But where
disbursed and present in barely perceptible quantities, it is more akin to a slow swoosh, creating
a spiral of heat that starts a tornado effect in the atmosphere. Where a slow explosion has
passed, the smoke created can linger, looking like a dark tornado floating in the air. Where the
slow explosion occurs at night, the light can seem dramatic for the few minutes it lasts. This is a
chemical reaction in the atmosphere, as we stated earlier in response to the initial report from
Iraq. More such light towers can be anticipated, but beyond this, more effects from the tail of
Planet X can be anticipated as the tail components increase in density in the atmosphere of
China has been cracking as southern China is pulled down along with the tongue of the Eurasian Plate
that houses Indonesia. Humongous sinkholes and landslides have developed along this line. Certainly
pockets of methane would likewise be released during such bending of the rock strata. Thus Xiamen is
the latest to report light magical light towers in the night sky.
- Mysterious beams of light hanging in night sky over Xiamen
July 12, 2010
- Dozens of vertical luminous beams appeared in the night sky of Xiamen about 11:30pm
[July 9] and lasted for nearly one hour. The Xiamen meteorological observatory said no
such astronomical phenomenon was monitored by the observatory. "But it was not a
meteor shower," a staff member said.
Second Sun Captures
Those who take the warnings about the pending passage seriously, and who have noted the Moon's
orbit to be eccentric and the Sun and constellations not in their proper place long to catch a glimpse of
Planet X in the sky, or better yet, catch this on film! Here would be the proof needed to convince
skeptical family and friends that a pole shift is in the Earth's future. The elusive Planet X is, however,
shrouded by a dust cloud that bounces sunlight back to the Sun, except for those rare moments when
the angle of reflection is just right. For those squinting at the sky or peering through dark lens at the Sun,
here are some examples of success and failure in the hunt for Planet X.
True Capture: This photo taken behind welder's lens on June 30, 2010 at just one minute shy of 8:00
pm is a true capture of Planet X. This is a sunset photo, taken in Colorado. The line of the Ecliptic,
which slants from upper left to lower right, is correct for the placement of Planet X which here appears
at the 4 o'clock position. Lens flares in the photo, differentiating the real thing from lens flares, show up
in a streak at 11:00 o'clock through to the 5 o'clock position where a line of orbs appear. This photo
contains both a real capture of Planet X and lens flares.
Hi Nancy, I recently posted a picture on my page and waited to see if anyone
thought it might be Planet X. Would you take a look and maybe ask the Zetas if it
is. There is a white speck sitting about 4:00 o clock. Taken using a welders mask
at a #13 setting and at the sepia color setting on my camera. If not X, what could
it be. Thanks.
Mystery Orb: This photo, taken on July 15, 2010 in South Carolina, turned out to be some sort of
bright orb above the Sun at the 11 o'clock position. Moon Swirl orbs do appear around the Sun when
the Moon Swirls tubes turn so that sunlight can funnel down them, emerging at the end as though light
coming out of a flashlight. They can be quite bright. Here, the photographer is confused about what was
captured. But note that another Moon Swirl capture was made just a couple days later in Canada, too.
I'm leary of all the alleged pictures of Planet X so when I took this yesterday
morning, I wasn't at all sure about it. I was driving in the car just holding the
camera up to the window.
I'm sad. It was just the sun. I got another few
pictures today and really paid attention to what I was photographing, and I'm
sorry to say it was only the sun behind the clouds. I'm positive the smaller one is
the sun. I've taken lots of pictures today trying to recapture it and I'm positive the
small one is the sun.
Moon Swirls: Moon Swirl captures frequently go in groups, and can indeed be seen naked eye as this
capture during sunrise in Canada shows. This was seen naked eye by the photographer on July 13,
2010 at 6:30 am.
I live in Winnipeg, Canada and am a subscriber to your weekly newsletter. The
other morning, on my way out the door to work, I was stopped in my tracks when
I noticed something unusual in the morning sky. The sun was breaking through the
sporadic cloud cover, and to it's left, I could clearly see a round ball object, that
appeared about half the size of the sun. With this strange cloud condition, I could
look directly at it(them), without eyestrain, and this formation near the sun was
distinctly clear - a perfect round ball. I ran back in the house to get my camera,
and a pair of sunglasses, which I shot the photos through. I've taken sun shots
before, with and without lens shading, and the glasses seem to help exposure. The
photos are not nearly as clear as my naked eye view.
Lens Flare: Even behind welder's lens, a lens flare can occur. Note in this photo, which appeared on
Coast to Coast's Photo-of-the-Day, that the photographer is sure he has captured an orb, and feels the
orb captured is NOT a lens flare. But the setup he is using shows his assumption incorrect. There are
line flares heading out from the Sun at 11 o'clock and 2 o'clock. And that bright orb at 1 o'clock is far
too bright to be Planet X, when compared to the Sun, also. Wrong placement too.
I was demonstrating a safe method for looking directly at the sun using welder's
glasses. To my surprise, I saw an object next to the Sun. So, I took my digital
camera and took a picture of the sun through the glasses. Since the object was
visible through the welder's glasses prior to taking the picture, it sure isn't a lens
Blaming the Sun has been NASA's top excuse for the Earth changes caused by Planet X. Planned for
decades, it was announced before the present solar cycle even began in 2000 that this solar cycle was
going to be the worst in man's memory. At first the solar maximum was expected to arrive in 2011 but it
was moved, conveniently, to 2012 to match the flood of books and movies touting 2012 as the End
Times date. Then the Sun refused to cooperate. Sunspots were almost nonexistent and CME's
miniscule. Nevertheless, on schedule, NASA came forth with scare stories about what might happen to
American's infrastructure if the Sun misbehaved. But the Sun continues to slumber. Frustrated, NASA
has now been forced to admit the Sun is asleep.
- Scientists Baffled by Unusual Upper Atmosphere Shrinkage
July 17, 2010
- An upper layer of Earth's atmosphere recently shrank so much that researchers are at a
loss to adequately explain it, NASA said. The thermosphere, which blocks harmful
ultraviolet rays, expands and contracts regularly due to the sun's activities. As carbon
dioxide increases, it has a cooling effect at such high altitudes, which also contributes to
the contraction. But even these two factors aren't fully explaining the extraordinary
contraction which, though unlikely to affect the weather, can affect the movement of
satellites. This is the biggest contraction of the thermosphere in at least 43 years. The
thermosphere interacts strongly with the sun and hence is greatly influenced by the sun's
solar activity, which occurs in cycles. When solar activity is high, solar extreme ultraviolet
rays warm and expand the thermosphere. When it's low, the opposite occurs. The collapse
occurred during what's known as a "solar minimum" from 2007 to 2009, during which the
sun plunged into an unprecedented low of inactivity. Sun spots were scarce and solar flares
were nonexistent, NASA reported. Still, the collapse of the thermosphere was bigger than
the sun's activity alone can explain. Emmert suggests that the increasing amounts of
carbon dioxide making its way into the upper atmosphere might have played a role in the
Per the Zetas, NASA is squeezed between their lies and their need to have an excuse for the Earth
changes. They are squirming.
ZetaTalk Comment 7/24/2010: In essence, and despite all manner of dire warnings that the solar
maximum this cycle was going to be horrific and outdo anything mankind had ever experienced,
NASA is having to admit that the opposite is occurring. The Sun is asleep. The shrinkage in the
thermosphere, normally occurring during a solar minimum, has not recovered from the solar
minimum of 2007-2009 but is in fact worse. This data of course goes hand in hand with the near
record days of absent sunspots the past few years, and the almost non-existent CME activity
during this time, when the solar maximum is supposed to be at hand. Desperate to continue the
cover-up over the presence of Planet X, which has caused this quiet Sun by its presence, NASA is
trying to revive the Global Warming argument. It's all due to CO2 in the upper atmosphere!
Why has this article, this admission from NASA, emerged at this time? Scientists worldwide are
familiar with the many data sets provided by NASA, often known as space weather. Even
amateurs have been noting discrepancies in NASA's conclusions, and the murmur level among
professional scientists is near riot. NASA's favored cover-up excuse, to blame the Sun for the
Earth changes, is no longer even remotely credible. They must finally admit the Sun is asleep, in
order to remain credible themselves. Yet to do so removed the excuse they have been floating out
to the general public to explain the weather and even to explain earthquake and volcanic activity
increase, which they had been trying to tie to their explosive solar activity predictions. Now
what? Revive the Global Warming theory and blame CO2! The theatre of the absurd is about to
You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly
Unsubscribe. You can always access prior Newsletters from the Archives.