Please do not reply to this Newsletter. You will likely get a response from a machine, not Nancy! For
feedback on the Newsletter or to correspond with Nancy, click here instead.
Wild speculation is circulating that Leo Wanta's $4.5 trillion is being illegally held by Citibank/Citicorp in
- Entire Citibank Board Believed to Have Been Arrested
November 6, 2007
- At 7.00pm Saturday 3rd November, the Provost Marshal was said to have signed a
document with Citibank providing for the transfer of the Ambassador's diverted $4.5
trillion held at the Citibank offices at 399 Madison Avenue, midtown New York, to begin at
7.00 am on Monday 5th November. However, despite innumerable promises and fanciful
undertakings from everyone the Principals have been short-changed by every single party
with whom they have had to deal. All that Mr Cottrell needs is a document confirming that
the Ambassador's $4.5 trillion funds, illegally diverted by the criminal enterprise called
Citibank/Citigroup, has been transferred to the relevant securities account at Morgan
Stanley, New York. As will be seen below, 160 delegates from foreign countries that are
due their linked settlement payments, flew into New York at the weekend, to take economic
receipt of their funds. They are reliably stated to be furious that they, along with
Ambassador Wanta, have been deceived. As stated in our report dated 4th October, we
then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its
delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion.
Citibank was indeed suffering, around this same time frame, with their stock dropping precipitously on
- Top US Analyst Hits Back After Death Threats Over Citigroup Downgrade
November 3, 2007
- Meredith Whitney, the analyst who prompted a $369 billion plunge in the value of US
shares on Thursday by issuing a negative note on Citigroup, hit out at Wall Street's culture
of intimidation yesterday after receiving several death threats from investors in the bank.
Ms Whitney prompted a near 7 per cent drop in Citigroup's shares after suggesting that the
bank needed to raise more than $30 billion to restore its capital cushion. She also
downgraded her recommendation on Citigroup's shares to "market underperform" in the
note that set off America's biggest stock market decline since August. Ms Whitney, Forbes's
second-highest ranked stock picker for 2007, told The Times: "People are scared to be
negative, especially when a company has such a wide holding. Clients are not pleased with
my call and I have had several death threats."
The Wanta funds were addressed in the ZetaTalk Newsletter on January 4, 2007, stating that there is
more truth than fiction to the Wanta funds rumors. Per the Zetas, the funds were collected during the
Reagan era to fund bunkers for the elite during the coming pole shift, but were laundered into various
banks under the excuse that the funds were to be used to bring down communist Russia. The Zetas
stated on July 29, 2006 that Wanta's $4.5 trillion was unlikely to be delivered into the US treasury as a
lump sum, as Wanta was requesting, as too many questions about where it came from would have to be
ZetaTalk Prediction 7/29/2006: So will that money be allowed to come into the treasury and
salvage the US? Not by a long shot. How would all of this be explained? It won't be explained.
There's too many questions that would be asked, too much of an uproar that would be made.
Thus, no matter how much heated discussion there will be about adjusting the books so we can
show that something has come in, they would have to do it in such a slow drip as to be balanced
somehow by the savings rate in Japan and China. Thus, it would never make that much of a
difference in the US debt.
Is there a relationship between the drop in Citibank's stock and the necessity of paying a large interest
payment to Ambassador Wanta? Have the Wanta trillions been transferred into the US treasury, to
prevent the US from becoming a banana republic? The Zetas explain.
ZetaTalk Explanation 11/10/2007: "There is no honor among thieves", is a common adage. This
is certainly true of the bankers and their cohorts who are holding the Wanta trillions. This money
gets shuffled ahead of the long reach of the law. Just when a warrant for the funds is being
issued, the funds are moved to another bank so the warrant no longer applies. This court case,
much in the rumor mill, is kept as a sealed case for national security reasons. The source of the
funds in the first place is considered scandalous, as the funds were stolen from the taxpayer in
the past and collected as proceeds from illicit drug running and arms sales. Yet there the funds
are, intended by the owner to be returned to the US taxpayer. The court cannot prosecute the
thieves as they are either dead or protected by immunity, having taken the steps they did under
orders from Reagan's Executive Orders. The courts can only pursue the funds and insist they be
delivered into the US treasury. The shuffle that has been going on, to keep the funds one step
ahead of warrants, has been countered, with warrants blocking the gate and allowing the funds
to be returned to the bank attempting to shuffle them out of sight. Thus, Citibank was caught,
and is indeed turning over these trillions to the US Treasury, which will never acknowledge
receiving them. Behind the scenes this reduces the US debt but this will not be revealed to the US
public. This allows the Bush administration to stop printing money like a banana republic, and
allows China to stop supporting the US debt, a task of which it has become weary.
China Dollar Dumping
On March 23, 2006 the M3 indicator was changed to hide the source of the funds being dropped into
the Treasury. This was to allow the US to begin printing money like a banana republic, as the Bush debt
had no other way to continue to be funded. Thus technically the public could not tell if the M3 funds
were from the House of Rothchild, bonds purchased by China, the US printing press, or the Wanta
ZetaTalk Prediction 3/17/2006: The national debt is skyrocketing, with countries like China
buying our bonds which is the only way the US is staying afloat other than to print money like a
banana republic. The M3 reporting, which shows the source of the funds being pumped into the
central banks, due to go secret on March 23, 2006, shows the relationship. What happens, then, if
the US dollar is no longer desired, because it is no longer needed for the oil markets? The dollar
gets dumped. As it drops in value, as it has been dropping in value, it does not make financial
sense for a country or individual to hold onto dollars. One day a dollar bill is worth $1.00, and
the next worth only $.75 as the trading value of the dollar has dropped. Who in the financial
markets wants to lose money? Thus, the purchase of US bonds by China stops, and the US debt
is no longer funded in a legal manner.
Since March, 2006 numerous countries have stopped using the US dollar exclusively as the medium of
exchange for oil. Not just Iran, but Saudi Arabia and other Middle East oil producing countries have
shifted from using the US dollar when accepting payment for oil. Now China is also turning from the
dollar. China has, as they have threatened to do, begun to dump US dollars.
- China Signals Dollar Swap
November 8, 2007
- China roiled financial markets around the globe yesterday when it asserted that the dollar
is losing its luster as the world's reserve currency and that Beijing will swap some of its
$1.4 trillion in reserves out of U.S. dollars and into stronger currencies like the euro and
What will the effect of China's dollar dumping be on the US economy and the world at large?
ZetaTalk Prediction 11/10/2007: Since the Wanta trillions are being delivered to the US Treasury,
albeit out of the public eye, China is being let off the hook. China has been purchasing US bonds
with the dollars it receives for US consumer spending, holding these bonds even though the
rapidly dropping dollar makes these bonds worth less when cashed in than when purchased.
China has been doing this as a favor to the Puppet Master, who did not want to see his US assets
destroyed in a depression. Now they are off the hook. What will China's switch to other
currencies and their dumping of US dollars mean to the world's economies? Outside of the US,
those holding US dollars will either attempt to likewise dump their dollars or be reluctant to
accept US dollars in exchange for their goods. Eventually, if the US dollar stabilizes, it will just
be a matter of an exchange rate, but at present the rapid drop in the dollar will make holding the
US dollar unattractive.
Within the US a dropping dollar equates to inflation, which will be denied by the Bush
administration while it is obvious to the US consumer. The price of food, gas, and oil are already
skyrocketing, as these commodities in the main come from outside the US. It takes more US
dollars to purchase them than in the past, as each dollar is worth less than in the past. China may
at long last free the yuan from the US dollar, allowing China's goods to appear more expensive
to the US consumer. The dropping US dollar will make goods manufactured in the US more
attractive worldwide and even more attractive within the US relative to goods manufactured
It is the oil wars that the US public will be most acutely aware of, as the Muslim countries enact
punishment for the Bush tirades against their countries. Iraq is barely pumping, their
infrastructure destroyed. Iraq also is refusing to give control of their oil fields to US oil
companies, a matter Bush has been pushing. Saudi Arabia is quietly enraged at the strong hand
the US and Israel have been trying, using bully tactics in Syria, one of their allies. They know
their country would be next, if the US and Israel were to win at this game. Russia likewise has
used the price of oil and gas to counter attempted US infiltration into their former satellite
countries. Venezuela is in tight with Russia and China on protecting Iran and pushing back
against US domination. And the US military is too weak to act as Bush's muscle in these oil wars,
wanting to withdraw from Iraq to nurse itself back to health. Where does this leave the US
during these oil wars? Suffering, and blaming Bush for all of it.
Not even two weeks after California was smitten with firestorms of record proportions, Tabasco in
Mexico was drowning in a flood of record proportions. Water covered 80% of the state.
- One million people affected by Mexico floods
November 2, 2007
- Rescuers worked Friday on rescuing hundreds of thousands of people trapped by the worst
floods ever recorded in Mexico's southern state of Tabasco, with more than one million
resident affected. The oil-rich state is now 80 percent underwater. "New Orleans was small
compared to this," said state Governor Andres Granier, comparing the disaster to the
flooding caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Area rivers continued to swell due to the
non-stop rain, and more than 850 towns have been flooded in the Gulf of Mexico state,
officials said. Of the 2.1 million Tabasquenos, more than half are suffering from this
serious problem that has not been experienced in the history of Tabasco.
ZetaTalk Comments 11/3/007: As with the scope of the California firestorms, what is notable
about this flood is its scope. Not just one river in the area burst their banks, but many did. Most
of the state of Tabasco was under water, with the residents having nowhere to flee but their
rooftops. We have mentioned that going into the pole shift such emergencies will pile on top of
one another, such that emergency management teams are exhausted and unable to attend to
those in distress. During the California firestorms this was not the case, so rescue operations
proceeded steadily and those stranded were taken to where they could get food and clean water.
But what if such rescue were not possible because the teams were busy elsewhere? What if
neighboring states and countries were overwhelmed with their own problems? What would the
populace of Tobasco do if there was no water to drink except the dirty water flowing past their
We have predicted that 90% of the world's population will die as a result of the coming pole shift.
Most die not because of direct injury from the pole shift, but because of starvation, depression,
illness resulting from poor nutrition or a depressed immune system, and injuries that lack medical
attention. What would have happened during the California firestorms if the emergency
management teams had not been able to move people from the path of the storm? How many
smoke inhalation and burn victims would have resulted and not been attended to had these teams
been occupied elsewhere or unable to travel due to road upheaval or windstorms preventing air
travel? How many Tabasco residents would be suffering from cholera had rescue not provided
them clean water to drink? These types of disasters, compounding and without letup, create
additional disasters in human suffering and a health crisis.
What should be done? Certainly those who can should arrange for a safe location, a place to flee
to when disasters begin to befall the area where they reside, work or attend school. Better yet is
to move to such a safe location and become familiar with gardening, saving seed, and flock or
herd management. Those living in large crowded cities are living on borrowed time, as the
earthquakes will come to these cities well before the pole shift, dropping the buildings into their
foundations and bursting gas, water and sewage mains, creating not only injury but a holocaust,
all amid rubble and broken roadways that prevent escape. If you have the ability to move to a
safe location where clean water is at hand and gardening skills can be gained, what are you
waiting for? Many cannot move, or cannot move until the last weeks when it is clear what is
unfolding without abatement. These individuals may have responsibilities to others, be the
mainstay for a family, and thus need to work in a dangerous locale. But can the family move,
with the wage earner visiting on weekends? Disasters such as the California firestorms and the
Tabasco floods can happen suddenly, or be a steady state affair such as the rising water along
the Louisiana coastline. Each area differs as to its vulnerability. But the message is clear. These
problems will not go away, but will only increase.
Israel is becoming desperate. They are surrounded by Arab states, and hoped to get the upper hand and
to even be able to co-manage the oil fields taken from these oil rich neighbors when Bush invaded Iraq
in 2003. This has not gone well, lately.
ZetaTalk Summary 9/15/2007: Israel expected not only an invasion of Iran, but a terrified Syria
and an occupied Saudi Arabia. They expected to expand their territory, via the US military
invasion of Iraq. Both Bush and Israel have been trying to goad neighboring states to start a
fracas, hoping that Iran and Syria will strike back and they can claim they, Israel, are then the
victims. The hope is that once the US military engages one of these states, such as Iran or Syria,
that the genie cannot be put back into the bottle, and the war both Bush and Israel want will be
off and running. Iran and Syria are not that dumb, and are winning at this game.
On September 5, 2007 six nuclear tipped misiles went missing from Minot Air Force Base in North
Dakaota, and not a day later on September 6, 2007 Israel conducted a bombing raid into neighboring
Syria. Coincidence? The day of the raid was the day Israel started experiencing network disruption.
Another coincidence? Per the Zetas, no coincidence.
- Mysterious 'snow' disrupts Israeli TV
October 12, 2007
- Israel is awash with speculation over the mysterious disappearance of satellite television
signals, with everyone from the Russians to the United Nations accused of jamming the
population's nightly entertainment. The television network is said to be "near collapse"
after a month of electronic snowstorms and interference, rumoured to be variously caused
by the radar of UN patrols, Russian spy ships or even Israel's military. The interference
began on Sept 6, the day Israeli warplanes slipped past Syria's Russian-made air defence
systems, and attacked a military target deep inside the country. The Israeli government has
maintained an almost total silence over the strike, which some foreign media reported as
an attack on a possible nuclear installation.
ZetaTalk Explanation 10/13/2007: The clue as to who or what is causing disruption lies in the
dates. If this started on the day Israel attempted to bomb Syria, then human hands are suspect.
Who stands to gain? Russia is supporting Syria and Iran in their battles with the US and Israel.
There are more than bombs to be used in battle, and confusing communications is certainly more
benign than Israel's plans for Syria!
Following the September 6, 2007 raid on Syria, Israel was mysteriously quiet and withheld any official
explanations. Per the Zetas, this was because there is a link between the attempted theft of the nuclear
tipped missiles and the Syrian raid, and the Israel was waiting to see what explanation the US might be
forced to proffer for the attempted theft of the nukes. Now that some 70 US enlisted men and officers
have been punished for sloppy work at Minot Air Force Base, Israel is proffering their side of the story
about the Syrian raid.
- Al Jazeera: U.S. Jets, Not Israeli, Attacked in Syria
November 2, 2007
- The fallout of conflicting information regarding the alleged strike against a Syrian nuclear
facility in September continues. Al Jazeera Channel's website quotes Israeli and Arab
sources as saying that the attack was carried out by U.S. warplanes, which used
mini-nuclear bombs to destroy the unfinished facility without killing any people. Israeli Air
Force jets only provided cover for the U.S. jets, according to this version of the event.
Previous reports have said that the raid was carried out by the IAF, or that U.S. jets
provided cover for the Israeli fighters.
Can this story from Israeli sources be believed? Not hardly, per the Zetas. This is just desperate Israel,
once again, trying to get the US and Syria to start a fight.
ZetaTalk Explanation 11/3/2007: Various stories have floated about regarding the Israeli raids
into Syria on September 6, 2007. Israel was at first mum, allowing rumors to float. That this
happened the day after the attempted theft of nukes from the US arsenals at Minot Air Force
Base in North Dakoka is significant. One of the rumors floating about was that these nukes were
to be used by the Israelis on their raid. This is true. When the nuke theft was discovered, Israel
proceeded with their planned raid, holding back on an explanation until the dust had settled.
They wanted to see the official US explanation for the attempted theft from the US arsenals
before proceeding with their own explanation for the Syrian raid. Thus, the odd Israeli silence on
the Syrian raid for weeks. That the attempted theft from Minot Air Force Base occurred on
September 5, 2007 and the Israeli raid occurred the very next day is not coincidence.
Israel expected to drop a nuke or two on Syria to bolster their claim that Syria was developing
nuclear material. Radiation from the US nukes would thus be claimed to be radiation emanating
from Syrian nuclear development. Thus is the mindset of those who would dominate the oil fields
in the Middle East. So what is the truth in this latest rumor spread by Israel about the Syrian
raid? The US was not involved, at all. The US did not provide nuke loaded planes. This is
another Israeli lie. The Israeli raid fell flat, and Russia has been jamming Israeli air waves from a
location in Syrian in retaliation ever since. Israel is trying to regain the high ground in this public
relations battle. They wish to be seen as powerful, feared, with powerful allies. Thus, they are
now floating the story that the US participated. Syria and Iran know the truth. The Al-Jazeera
report is taking care to only quote sources, not to pronounce the statements as true. Look for
countering statements to be made in this war of words.
Video Clip on Bush Clones
The Zeta Report 14 - Bush Clones. Which one had the broken nose? How many are
there? And which one is in the White House now? Click on the image or click Here to watch.
You received this Newsletter because you subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly