Planet X: ALTERNATIVE Explanation #1
The Zetas have repeatedly stated that NASA et al would muster forth
Alternative Explanations for Planet X, most likely first calling it a
nova, and then an asteroid swarm. This is all to keep the public dumb
and complacent, while the establishment, NASA and those who commandeered
the White House stock up their bunkers and slink away without telling
you. From existing ZetaTalk, written Dec 15, 2000.
[Planet X] will be visible to the common man some 7 weeks
prior to the shift, without the use of telescopes, and that
[Planet X] zooms through the solar system during that time,
from one side to the other, in 3 short months, a period of 12
weeks. Thus, it becomes visible when out on the outer edge
of the solar system, and will gain in size and brightness as
it comes closer. ... At first, this reddish cross will be a
curiosity, to those not in the know about the coming
passage. It will be most visible at night, when not diluted
by sunlight, and will have many explanations depending
upon the culture viewing it's approach. A warning, a sign,
an approaching demon, an approaching angel, or, if the folk
are listening to scientists intent upon giving scientific
explanations to null the alarm of the populace, all manner
of astronomical occurrences. But it grows larger, and brighter,
weekly. Ah, but novas do likewise, so this will be the
explanation of choice among those distracting and placating
a nervous populace. When it becomes apparent that there
is motion in this reddish cross, and novas do not move in
the skies, there will be no comment from the scientific
establishment, but by then it will be almost too late for the
public to react.
ZetaTalk: Reddish Cross
During the March 29, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session I posted as a SIGN
of the TIMES someone's note that V838 Mon was in the news, but without,
for the general public, any mention of WHERE this dramatically exploding
star was located. Several NASA and astronomy news web sites failed to
Now we know WHY.
Yesterday I heard from someone in Sweden/Norway just WHY the location is
omitted, for the general public.
I saw some frightening news on the Swedish television today
about an exploding star nearby the Orion that supposedly
has become a big reddish object on the sky. It was suggested
that it could possible grow larger, and could even be seen
at daylight. I checked www.nasa.gov, and there I found this
article about a star V838 Mon that has emerged something
in the same manner as PX has.
It was also made an animation of the star V838 Mon, and the
animation shows a development to a large reddish object,
similar to the latest pictures of PX. Is this a possible coverup
from the establishment?
Surely we can trust NASA, who withholds the live feed from the Hubble
from the tax payers who pay for it all. The ESA, whose first instinct is
to provide information, does a bit of a better job.
26-Mar-2003 January 2002, a moderately dim star in the
constellation Monoceros, the Unicorn, suddenly became
600 000 times more luminous than our Sun. This made it
temporarily the brightest star in our Milky Way. The
light from this eruption created a unique phenomenon
known as a 'light echo' when it reflected off dust shells
around the star. ... The brightness of V838 Monocerotis,
as astronomers call the star, has long since returned to
normal levels. 600 000 times more luminous than our Sun.
If this is in the constellation Monoceros, the Unicorn, so why is the
Swedish TV stating Orion? An ASU Press Release states that V838 Mon is a
ASU gets second Nature cover in March: new kind of
nova discovered Astronomers using NASA's Hubble
Space Telescope are keenly watching a wave of light
sweeping though space from a mysterious star that
unexpectedly brightened, like a camera flash popping
off. ... The outburst of V838 Mon was somewhat similar
to that of a nova.
PRESS RELEASE NO.: STScI-PR03-10
Zetas RIGHT Again!