Re: Planet X - March 06 Image
In Article: <1eO9a.firstname.lastname@example.org> David Tholen wrote:
> Steve Havas writes:
>> A single 1200 second 1 x binning image was taken last night, March 06.
> How can you distinguish between non-moving nebulosity and a
> moving object with just a single image, Havas?
To address your question more directly, Dave, we can tell it is a moving
object, for one, because it is
TRACKING TO THE ZETA COORDINATES
NOT ON EXISTING STAR CHARTS.
Specifically, on the dates when images were taken, with FITS files
available always for the public to download and examine on their own
(which thousands do now, per the last count made in early February).
Those dates being, in 2002 - Sep 21, Sep 26, Oct 04, Oct 11, Nov 11, Nov
15, Dec 04, Dec 13, and Dec 27. Those dates being, in 2003 - Jan 10, Jan
18, Jan 25, Jan 26, Jan 28, Jan 30, Feb 03, Feb 07, Feb 22, Feb 26, and
now Mar 06.
And it is also
CLEARLY INBOUND AS IT HAS MOVED FROM A DOT
TO A TAIL HAZE
TO MOONS IN THE TAIL DISCERNABLE
TO A TAIL BLOTCH
TO A DUST CLOUD EVIDENT
TO A DUST CLOUD STRIKINGLY BRIGHT.
As explained on the Trends page, done up in early February, 2003
The entire complex (Planet X corpus, moon swirls, dust cloud) appeared
as a DOT on Sep 21, 2002, which DOT was being called pixel defects.
The complex then increased in brightness and size until a TAIL HAZE was
evident on Nov 15, 2002, then increasing in brightness and size until
Dec 4, 2002, when MOON SWIRLS began to be discernatble, then increasing
in size and density until Dec 28, 2002 when DISTINCT MOONS became
discernable, increasing from 2 to a count of 29 by the end of January,
2003. The DISTINCT MOONS were being called asteroids until the moon
count climbed up into the dozens. And now, we have the DUST CLOUD, so
bright and large it is being claimed as a nebula by the debunking team.
Tisk. When it approaches for the passage, shortly after May 15, 2003,
it will be called whatever will allow the White House to rush to their
bunkers and slam the doors on the public which they have so desperately
mislead lo these many months. At all costs they wish to avoid your
messy panic and demands to include the taxpayer in safety and survival
plans. The taxpayer, the general public, being subhuman, apparently,
does not count.