Re: Planet X: Dec 13 and 14 Images

O Brother

Thanks for the Questions.
I'm sure they will be answered in my forthcoming report ;o)

1) I did expect that those who posted here with such certainty on this
   issue would know the answers to some of the Q's you have listed.
   But, you and the chorus have shown by your past responses, your lack
   of depth both in knowledge and experience. Perhaps I can help
   enlighten you.

2) We have reached the point where your denial of the existence of an
   imaged object at the coordinates will be seen as either refusal to
   recognize reality or a deliberate attempt to cover up an unfolding
   situation.

3) I suggest you aquire the FIT files and begin an analysis of the
   images, so you are familiar with the issue. At this point you have
   left no indication that you have done anything but follow the Shepherd
   of Sci.Astro.

J.William Dell
Weird Science Award 2002 


> Hey JWD.
> 
> Since you are nancy's "most excellent pixel analyst", please explain for us:
> (1) How every star in the sky has only 1 image but yours has two?  Just go
>     out and look up, how may images of betelgeuse, sirius, polaris, etc. do you
>     see?
> (2) How your star, since it is HUGE, 11th Mag, 20thMag, has a LONG Tail
>     (your words) and swirling moons, but is only being seen by only Zeta
>     Believers and no one else?
> (3) How is it that if it's being covered up so well, that you all cannot
>     identify it even?  Nancy draws circles and you pick out what you think is
>     what she means, but somehow the evil government already knows about it and
>     is surpressing all of the world's astronomers not to look at it?
> (4)  What is the trajectory of this HUGE and AWSOME image?
> (5) How can it get brighter and dimmer and be HUGE at the same time?
> (6) How can moons and dust "swirl" behind it with no atmosphere to cause
>     this phenomenon?  If there is a tail and there is ejecta from the object,
>     what is causing this phenomenon?
> (7) If the image is filtered with a RED filter, how can 'white' light make
>     it through?
> (8) You say there has been no scientific inquiry into your planet, aren't
>     the above questions VERY RELEVANT towards proving your planet exists?  Do
>     you expect the world to scan the heavens, pick any candidate object -
>     anywhere, label it planet x and then ask you if its the one you're talking
>     about?
> 
> All of those questions constitute how your imagined planet lines up with
> actual, measured reality.  Until you can square it with reality, then it's
> just a wet dream.
> 
> There, answer those questions and your choir of "nattering nabobs" will
> quiet down.  Of course you'll ignore it and will just have to live with the
> many difficult questions.  How long are you going to avoid the issues?  How
> long are you going to pretend that this scam is real?  Where will you be in
> MAY when your planet doesn't show up and you look like the northern end of a
> southbound horse?
> 
> O'