Subject: Re: Planet x: Dec 13, 14 Images

Michael L Cunningham wrote:

> It's a VERY small inner group now. Only the hard-core bozos are sticking
> with Nancy now. Notice Jan has completely stopped posting to tt-watch or
> this group. He was the biggest Zeta defender less than a year ago.

I wouldn't jump to conclusions like that, Mike.

I have been on the road for most of Q4, so unfortunately I missed both the
Leonids and the Eclipse. (I was recently in SA, but had to leave just a few
days before the 4th. I heard it was overcast in Kruger Park though, so I
didn't miss any of the action.) My "silence" has been mostly due to lack of
time, but also that my interest for low-level childish argumentation with
the sci.astro debunkers is steadily diminishing. I must say though, that I
find cases like our Hawaiian nitpicker quite interesting from a
psychological viewpoint, just as the obsession you guys seem to have with
ZetaTalk.

As you may have noted, I have been skeptical of the imaging & analysis so
far. I have noted however that according to the discussions here on
sci.astro, there seems to be something on the Dec 4 images. I have just
downloaded the Dec 13 & 14 images to check them out for myself.

However, my general opinion about the possibility of a pole shift or the
existence of Planet X or Nibiru has not changed a bit, nor has my general
position on ZetaTalk. I find most of the information there extremely
interesting, to-the-point, and giving better explanations to a number of
mysteries on Earth than any other source I have found. (Some restructuring
to ease the navigation through the maze could be useful, though.)

I also find that in general, the ZetaTalk predictions for Earth changes
prior to the predicted passing of Planet X are pretty much on target, as are
all the predicted "Planet X" stories popping up these days, pointing away
from Nibiru. Alas, my plans for May 2003 have not changed.

Regards,
Jan