Re: Planet X: Dec 13, 14 Images

Steve Havas wrote:

> The images (fits files and BMP's) can be download here:
>
> http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/stevehavas/lst?.dir=/shavas&.view=l
>
> Dec 13, 15 x 240sec exposures, 4 x 1200sec exposures Red filter
> Dec14,  15 x 240sec exposures  Red filter
>
> The new objects are obvious, especially on the Dec13-1200-1 image and 
> all the 15 Dec 14 images. Something huge shows up very near the Dec 18 
> coordinates Ra: 4 22 31, Dec: 12 7 15.7 and other large objects can be seen 
> trailing below and to the left. Again, not on DSS or NEAT images.

You have done it again Steve... thanks so much for your tireless efforts that go 
totally unappreciated.

It will be interesting to see how the elite sci-astro mud-slinging, name-calling, 
snobs, react to your obvious proof of a stellar object, at predicted coordinates, 
with predicted behavior, and coming at us in 3/3/2003.

I look forward (albeit sadly) to their blind refusal, and dogmatic faith, to even 
see the obvious, when its now blatently in their face.... even though they were 
warned since 1995.  Somethings just never change.

I hope the sci-astro snobs are better at gardening, and survival, than they are 
in challenging their own dogma, and blind conclusions.... time will tell that too.

What I find odd, is that even Albert Einstein, up until his death, and relationship 
with Charles Hapgood (who authored books such as "Path of the Poles", and
"Earths shifting Crust", and others), had supported theories that support abrupt 
climatic changes, such as a pole shift.  Einstein even wrote the forward in 
Hapgood's book!

http://www.geocities.com/leyrider/lightfall0341.htm
http://www.lauralee.com/rflemath/e-h.htm
http://www.flem-ath.com/e-h.htm

The fact that Hapgood couldn't explain the mechanism of his theory,  does 
not detract from his contribution; just as Newton's work on gravity is not 
diminished by his inability to explain what gravity actually is. Time will prove 
Hapgood correct on just about everything.  And that the mechanism
for the crustal shifts will turn out to be a periodic earth rendezvous with a 
nemesis planet X, is surely nothing to mock, or not consider.

And yet, I would suggest, that if Hapgood were to come in this room, and talk 
about the lost continent of "Atlantis", which was the spark of his studies... that 
he would be mocked, and stoned, just like Nancy.

All great thinkers, inventors, and philosophers were mocked by the "academia 
elitist's".

Steve Hava's has now provided more evidence and data, that should now 
wake up even the most blind skeptics.... and I predict it will be mocked, and/or 
explained away with desparate idea's, and cheap cliche's, that carry no proof.

Observer on the Fringe