Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW
Article: <5f1hlj$k5d@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> 
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Hale-Bopp THEN and NOW
Date: 26 Feb 1997 14:34:27 GMT
In article <5eveji$5sj@pollux.cmc.ec.gc.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
> In the case of an orbiting body, the line of force is always
> centrally directed, that is, along the line joining the
center
> of masses of the two bodies in question. It just so happens
> that the forces that a body free to move in a potential
field
> such as gravity experiences are such that conic sectional
> geodesics are produced. 
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Apparently, objects in orbit are following the law of
Rock-on-the-End-of-a-String as well as the Law of the Magical
Ellipse. A body free to move in a gravity field always moves in
conic sections? Is this what happens when an object thrown from
an airplanes plummets to Earth? Are they not in a gravity field? 
    - How does your theory of how an orbiting object behaves
        line up with vector analysis? This might look good on
        paper for a circular orbit, but what happens when the
        orbit becomes a long ellipse? The two vectors producing a
        curve are pushing the comet away from the Sun and to one
        side, Side A as it is leaving the Solar System, yet
        somehow the vector pushing the comet to side A SWITCHES
        DIRECTION and pushed the comet to Side B far out in
        space? What occurred for that to happen?
- How does your theory hold up against your laws of
        gravity? An object attracted by another due to gravity
        HEADS DIRECTLY FOR IT. The comet when out in space, will
        at all times have MORE reason to move directly for the
        Sun than to move dramatically to the side. Do your moving
        airplanes, on a forward thrust parallel to the surface of
        the Earth, not plummet DIRECTLY to Earth in short order
        when they lose their wings? 
- How does your theory hold up against your laws of motion,
        which state that a moving object moves in a straight line
        unless perturbed? What perturbation can occur to cause a
        comet to move from Side A to Side B when out in space? If
        you had a second focus way out there, and the comet were
        circling BOTH the Sun and this second focus, then you
        might have a case, but there is NO second focus, per you,
        out there. What perturbs the comet out there?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])