| |
|
Article: <5ebbf3$sld@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Nancy/Zetas
Date: 18 Feb 1997 04:33:39 GMT
In article <5e8h8n$qn4@news.ccit.arizona.edu> Jim Scotti
writes:
> Yes, an explosion - one that looked just like a nuclear
> explosion, caused by the catastrophic disintegration of the
> 50 meter asteroid, by aerodynamic stresses as it plunged
> through about 8-10 kilometers altitude. ... The meteor
> remains have been tentatively identified as microscopic
> bits embedded in trees and in the soil - this small
meteoroid
> was VAPORIZED by the blast that it created.
> jscotti@LPL.Arizona.EDU (Jim Scotti)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
At least we agree that it was an explosion. Please justify your
explanation that the explosion was caused by a large meteor that
VAPORIZED as it positioned itself just above the ground level.
The cause of this vaporization? Historical evidence that meteors
vaporize just prior to impact? What type of instability would be
inherent in a meteor, yet allow it to travel through space,
experience extreme high heat upon entry into the Earth's
atmosphere, yet arrive intact at the surface of the Earth where
it would THEN explode?
We await your explanation with baited breath! But we predict
you'll fail to address our request for an explanation. Run and
hide, Jim!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])